The Olivine-Wadsleyite Phase Transrmation in Mantle Peridotite

Jianzhong Zhang1,2 Liping Wang1, and Yusheng Zhao2

1 SUNY at Stony Brook;

2Los Alamos Neutron Science Center, Los Alamos National Laboratory)

jzhang@lanl.gov

NSLS-X17B (MAP) and APS-GSECARS

One of the most important goals in studying the olivine (a)-wadsleyite (b) transformation is to understand the now well-accepted seismic discontinuity near the depth of 410 km in the Earth's mantle. Although one school of thought attributes such a discontinuity to radical chemical changes from lherzolite to picritic eclogite (Anderson and Bass, 1986), it has widely been viewed that this discontinuity is caused by the a-b transformation in an isochemical peridotitic mantle (Ringwood, 1975 and 1979). If this interpretation is valid, the composition and temperature of the mantle can be inferred at this depth, providing useful information for understanding the present state of the Earth's transition zone. Although there have been numerous experimental investigations of this transformation, most studies were conducted either using quench method or in the simple Mg2SiO4-Fe2SiO4 system. No efforts have been directed to study the kinetic barrier of the olivine-wadsleyite transformation under normal mantle conditions. In addition, recent studies have demonstrated increasing needs for the study of this transformation in complex system relevant to the Earth's mantle.
A two-stage multi-anvil press (T-cup) was utilized on the superconducting wiggler beamline X-17B of National Synchrotron Light Source and on the bending magnet at beamline 13-BM-D of the Advanced Photon Source. The KLB-1 spinel lherzolite, a xenolith from Kilborne Hole crater in New Mexico, is chosen as starting material because it represents one of the most undepleted mantle compositions and thus a suitable rock specimen for simulating the Earth?s mantle. The powder KLB-1 sample was pre-annealed in the temperature range of 1200-1600°C at the pressures in close proximity to the a to a + b and a + b to b phase boundaries but outside the a + b loop.
The present experimental results have provided a lower bound for the stability field of b phase (b-out) at 1215 °C and an upper bound for the stability field of a phase (a out) at 1505°C. In addition, the nucleation barriers determined from reversal experiments at 1300°C and higher temperatures seem to be about 0.2-0.3 GPa for both a ® a + b and a + b ® b phase boundaries, and the width of the two-phase loop appears to be no more than 0.4 GPa. Based on the petrologic barometry and thermometry, the mantle temperatures near the 410-km depth were estimated to be in the range of 1300-1400°C (e.g., Mercier and Carter, 1991; Nisbet et al., 1993). The middle point of these temperatures intersects the two-phase loop of Fig. 7 at pressures of 13.5-13.9 GPa, which is comparable to the pressure of 13.7 GPa at the discontinuity. This match provides additional confidence in the experimental results that have been achieved. The findings obtained from these pilot experiments demonstrate an experimental feasibility to resolve a pressure difference of less than 0.4 GPa for the two-phase loop, even when the effect of nucleation barrier is taken into account.
This work is jointly supported by the NSF-funded Consortium for Materials Properties Research in Earth Sciences and by the Department of Energy.